Contact us
Ben Burns
e-mail Ben or call 313.882.2810
Nancy Nall Derringer
e-mail Nancy or call 313.417.0122
Sheila Young Tomkowiak
e-mail Sheila or call 313.881.1734
CONTRIBUTORS:
Click on the link below for a complete list of contributors and their contact information.
Follow us
Contribute
Advertise
Contact Sheila Tomkowiak
313-881-1734 or sheila@grossepointetoday.com
Contribute
Advertise
Contact Sheila Tomkowiak
313-881-1734 or sheila@grossepointetoday.com
Become a GrossePointeToday sponsor
Your tax-deductable contribution will help us better serve the Grosse Pointes. Make a charitable gift of $1,000 and become an Honorary Publisher, $500 and become an Honorary Editor, or $100 and become an Honorary Reporter. You'll be invited to our annual forum to discuss how to make GrossePointeToday.com a more vital news and information source.
Your tax-deductable contribution will help us better serve the Grosse Pointes. Make a charitable gift of $1,000 and become an Honorary Publisher, $500 and become an Honorary Editor, or $100 and become an Honorary Reporter. You'll be invited to our annual forum to discuss how to make GrossePointeToday.com a more vital news and information source.
© 2009-2012 GrossePointeToday.com, a 501c3 organization

The investigation of Diver, left, began after a similar investigation in another district turned up his gpschools.org email address.


Comments
South Principal Story
Grosse PointePatch did a newsworthy story on this, including information about Diver's history as a principal in other districts. That sory did not meniton the information about pornography being the reason for the dismissal. Apparentlly this bit of information is not coming from the school, but from an unnamed source. When it comes to reporting stories as scandal, this publication looks a lot more like "The National Inquirer" than like "The New York TImes." You have lost your credibility with me. Tija Spitsberg
South Principal Story
To Tija Spitsberg:
Yes, the Grosse PointePatch did a very newsworthy story on this, but certainly any grown adult knows one cannot mention pornography as being the reason for the dismissal BEFORE IT'S OFFICIALLY RELEASED BY THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION, unless that is one wants to invite a lawsuit. It seems to me the only one who lost any credibilty here is YOU!
Greg Walton
Porn =! Libel, Porn =! Lawsuit
I do not understand why you believe "any grown adult cannot mention pornography as being the reason for the dismissal". Saying someone viewed porn is not libel or slander so I do not see where there is invitation for a lawsuit. Saying someone was fired or resigned after viewing porn at the job when that IS in fact the case is not libel or slander either. I doubt even saying someone was fired or resigned after viewing porn at the job when that is NOT the case would be libel or slander. It would be awfully hard to get a jury to agree to calling that libel or slander in the US of A. Viewing porn is not a crime. So lying and saying someone was fired for viewing porn at the job is essentially treated as harmful as lying and saying someone was fired for being habitually late for their job. It is not all that damning.
No one lied and said something to the effect of "Mr. So-and-So lost his job after he murdered a bus full of children and bathed in their blood" so I can't see why you believe there is invitation for a lawsuit.
National Inquirer? Oh PLEASE!
Grosse Pointe Today trumped everybody with this story , and they got their facts straight, including porn as the reason for the dismissal. Just because a source is unnamed doesn't mean it's wrong. Hooray for legitimate, locally-owned journalism! Does Patch even know where Grosse Pointe South IS?
Diver
Actually, they may have gotten the story wrong. According to a staff person at the schools, what actaully happened is that the two echanged a lewd, dirty joke. Not quite the same as posting porn. They may have opened up the door to libel. Tija Spitsberg
Nope.
Tija, I can tell you that is flat wrong. I stand by all our reporting. -- NND